Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is calling for greater accountability from U.S. leadership while warning that the country is now in a weakened position in its dealings with Iran following the collapse of recent negotiations.

In a media interview Monday, Clinton sharply criticized President Donald J. Trump’s rhetoric and conduct, arguing that presidential words carry significant consequences both domestically and abroad.

“Words, especially from an American president, have real consequences,” Clinton said, adding that leaders must be held accountable not only for their actions but also for their public statements. She described recent rhetoric from Trump as “disgraceful” and warned it risks undermining U.S. credibility on the world stage.

Clinton framed accountability as extending beyond legal wrongdoing to include standards of leadership and respect for democratic institutions. “We need to hold leaders accountable for what they say as well as what they do,” she said, emphasizing that public trust depends on both behavior and tone from those in power.

Her comments come as tensions between the United States and Iran have escalated following the breakdown of diplomatic talks over the weekend. Negotiations aimed at addressing Iran’s nuclear program ended without agreement, with Vice President JD Vance returning from discussions in Pakistan without a deal.

Clinton warned that the failed talks have left the U.S. at a strategic disadvantage. “I worry that the United States is now in a very weak position vis-à-vis Iran,” she said, arguing that Washington has “lost the leverage and initiative” it once held in negotiations.

The Trump administration has responded by escalating pressure on Iran. The president recently ordered a U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz, a key global shipping route. U.S. Central Command has warned that unauthorized vessels entering the zone could be intercepted or seized, signaling a significant increase in military and economic pressure.

Clinton offered a mixed assessment of Trump’s approach. She said she supported a targeted strike on Iranian nuclear facilities earlier this year, describing it as a limited and appropriate action. However, she criticized subsequent moves as inconsistent and lacking a clear long-term strategy.

“I supported Trump bombing the nuclear sites back in June,” she said. “I thought that was an appropriate and limited strategic objective. I opposed his incoherent attack on Iran.”

She argued that the U.S. must return to structured diplomacy led by experienced experts, particularly those with deep knowledge of nuclear policy and international negotiations.

“We’re going to have to bring in people who actually know something about nuclear weapons,” Clinton said.

Clinton also referenced her past experience dealing with Israeli leadership, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, noting longstanding disagreements over how aggressively to confront Iran. She said U.S. leaders have historically resisted calls for open-ended conflict without a defined objective.

“I had many long conversations… about refusing to go along with actions that had no real end state,” she said.

The White House pushed back forcefully on Clinton’s criticism. In a statement, officials defended the administration’s approach and attacked Clinton’s foreign policy record, particularly her support for the Obama-era nuclear agreement with Iran.

Administration officials argued that prior policies allowed Iran to expand its capabilities and that the current strategy is focused on restoring deterrence and protecting U.S. interests.

“Crooked Hillary is one of the worst and weakest foreign policy officials to ever disgrace the United States Government,” a White House spokesperson said, adding that Trump is taking necessary steps to address threats created by previous administrations.

Hillary Clinton’s remarks are particularly ironic, given that she was never held accountable for her deletion of 33,000 emails as Secretary of State, her improper disclosure of classified information, or for being the mastermind behind the Russia Hoax.

This article may contain commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.